Your key is never stored or sent anywhere except the Anthropic API.
Jira Forge App → BuilderBias

Alignd Idea Agent

Analyze ideas. Ask strategic questions. Build the delivery scaffold. All in one agent.

The Problem

In SAFe enterprise environments, validating a new business idea takes 2-4 weeks and 3-5 meetings before it gets a yes, defer, or reject. The data needed already exists: OKRs, roadmap capacity, open Jira blockers, related epics. Nobody has time to synthesize it. Ideas stall, misaligned epics enter backlogs, and PMs spend hours on artifact work instead of product thinking.

Two Modes, One Agent
Idea Agent

Submit a business idea, get full portfolio analysis and delivery scaffold

Portfolio Advisor

Ask strategic questions — what to build, where velocity is lost, what users want

How It Works
01
Connect

Load your OKRs, PI roadmap, Jira backlog, and GitHub repo. The agent reasons across all of it.

02
Ask Anything

Submit a new idea OR ask a strategic question like "what should we prioritize this PI?"

03
Decide + Build

Review the analysis. Say "Proceed" and the agent scaffolds the full SAFe delivery structure.

What The Agent Returns
OKR Alignment

Scores each OKR 0-10 with rationale. Color-coded green / amber / red.

Roadmap Fit

Target PI, owning team, and capacity signal from live sprint velocity.

Live Blockers

Jira impediments plus PR review notes flagging cross-team dependencies.

Code Health Signals

Open PRs, stale branches, and review thread blockers from GitHub.

Recommendation

Approve / Defer / Reject with data-backed rationale.

Draft Artifacts

Epic, PI Objective, and Portfolio Sync entry ready for human review.

Conversational Follow-Up

Both modes support multi-turn conversation. Ask follow-up questions and the agent references actual Epic IDs, OKR names, PR details, and team data in its answers.

"Why is this on hold?" "What should we prioritize this PI?" "Where are we losing velocity?" "What do users want most?"
When You Say Proceed — The Delivery Scaffold
Team Level Sprint Planning doc • Daily Standup with blockers pre-loaded • Sprint Review agenda • Retro risk prompts
Program Level PI Objectives drafted • Program Board dependencies • ART Sync watch item • System Demo slot • I&A input
Portfolio Level Portfolio Sync Epic card • LPM investment record with capacity data
Jira Creates Epic • Seed stories • Linked blockers • PI Objective record • OKR labels • Risk tickets
Git Setup Feature branch from main • PR template with PI Objective + acceptance criteria • Stale branch cleanup flags
The Builder — Barkley T. Elgin

Alignd is not a hackathon project. It is a proof of concept built by a practitioner who has lived inside the coordination problems it solves.

The agent is only as good as the data

Alignd synthesizes what your teams actually put in. Product managers and engineers need to write detailed tickets: clear acceptance criteria, explicit dependencies, realistic story points, and OKR tags. A vague ticket produces a vague analysis. The more context your team puts in, the sharper the intelligence coming out.

Speeding up work completion

Alignd watches ticket age, assignee load, and description quality together. When a ticket has been in progress for two sprints with a one-line description and no acceptance criteria, that is a pattern, not a coincidence. The agent flags it with specific, actionable coaching.

PI Planning at Scale
Q: Walk me through how you've run or supported PI Planning at scale.

The most important work in PI Planning happens in the week before it starts. If teams walk in without draft objectives that already connect to portfolio OKRs, you lose a big chunk of the two days relitigating strategy instead of resolving dependencies. During the event itself I watch the confidence vote closely. A room full of 6s and 7s is telling you something: either the capacity math is off or there are dependencies nobody wants to say out loud yet. That signal is worth stopping for. Alignd came out of that exact frustration — spending hours pulling together the data needed for that pre-PI conversation from five different places.

Cross-ART Dependencies Mid-PI
Q: How do you manage cross-ART dependencies when they go sideways mid-PI?

The first thing I learned is that by the time something has "gone sideways" you have usually already lost a sprint. So the real answer is: set up the ART Sync cadence so you catch it earlier. I use a simple severity model. If a dependency is threatening a PI Objective I escalate to RTE and ART leadership within 24 hours, but I come with a specific ask, not just a flag. The ask is one of three things: descope the story, pull in capacity from another team, or formally adjust the commitment.

Coaching SAFe Adoption
Q: How do you coach teams that are resistant to SAFe adoption?

I try to figure out what they are actually resisting first because it is rarely SAFe itself. Usually it is a specific ceremony that feels like overhead. So I start by asking what is painful for them right now: what decisions take too long, what meetings feel pointless, where do they feel like they are working blind. Then I connect SAFe practices to those specific things rather than selling the framework in the abstract.

Portfolio Sync Excellence
Q: What does good look like at the Portfolio Sync level?

The thing I watch for is whether the meeting is about decisions or about status. If someone is reading out Jira column states that everyone already has access to, that is a sign the sync has become theater. A good one surfaces two or three things that actually need a call made: an Epic that has drifted from the OKR it was supposed to support, a capacity situation that requires a reallocation. That is the thinking behind how Alignd formats the Portfolio Sync entry it generates — put the decision-relevant information first so the conversation can skip the recap and get to the actual work.

Idea Agent

Describe a business idea. Alignd analyzes it against your org's OKRs, roadmap, and backlog.

Alignd is analyzing your idea
Ask a follow-up

Portfolio Advisor

Ask strategic questions about your portfolio. Alignd reasons across your OKRs, roadmap, backlog, and GitHub signals to give you direct, opinionated insight.